This is the symbol to get the attention of the operator. Its real meaning is dependent on the color scheme.
Acceptability for Electronic Assemblies : connector pins
Target-Class1,2,
.Pins are straight,not twisted and properly seated.
.No discernible damage
1.No discernible damage
2.Land
3.No discernible twist
Acceptable-Class1,2,3
.Pins are slightly bent off center by 50% pin thickness or less.
.Pin height varies within tolerance.
Note:
Nominal height tolerance is per pin connector or master drawing specification.The connector pins and mating connector must havea good electrical contact.
1.Pin height tolerance
2.Less than 50% pin thickness
Acceptable-Class1,2
.Less than or equal to 75% of the width(W) of the annular ring is lifted.
.Damaged nonfunctional lands for single and double-sided boards are acceptable if firmly attached to board in unlifted areas.
1.Land lifted 75% of annular ring or less
2.Land with conductor
3.Land not fractured
4.Land lifted,fractured but firmly attached land with out conductor (nonfunctional)
Defect-Class1,2
Any functional annular ring which is lifted more than 75% of the width(W).
Defect-Class3
Any lifted or fractured annular rings with press fit pins.
1.Land fractured
2.Functional land lifted greater than 75% of annular ring
3.Landlifted
Defect-Class1,2,3
Pin is bent out of alignment.(Pin is bent off center greater than 50% pin thickness.
Defect-Class1,2,3
Pin visibly twisted.
Defect-Class1,2,3
Pin height is out of tolerance as to specification.
Defect-Class1,2,3
Damaged pin as a result of handling or insertion.
Mushroomed
Bent
Defect-Class1,2,3
Damaged pin (exposed basis metal).
Defect-Class2,3
Burr
1.Burr
2.Plating missing
Press Fit Pins-Soldering
The term “press fit pins” is generic in nature and many types of pressure inserted pins,e.g. connector,staked,etc.,are not intended to be soldered,if soldering is required the following criteria is applicable
Target-Class1,2,3
.A 360 solder fillet is evident on the secondary side of the assembly.
.Note:Solder fillet or fill on primary side is not required.
1.Bottom view
2.Side view
3.Land
4.Top view
5.PCB
Acceptable-Class1,2
Solder fillet or cover age (secondaryside) is present on two adjacent sides of the pin.
1.Bottom view
2.Side view
3.Land
4.Top view
5.PCB
Acceptable-Class1
Solder wicking is permitted above 2.5mm\[0.0984in] on sides of pins provided there is no solder build up which interferes with subsequent attachments to the pin.
Acceptable-Class2,3
Solder wicking on sides of pins is less than 2.5mm\[0.0984in], provided the solder does not interfere with subsequent attachments to the pin.
Defect-Class1,2
Solder fillet or coverage is evident on less than two adjacent
sides of the pin on the secondary side.
Defect-Class3
Solder fillet is evident on less than four sides of the pin on
the secondary side.
Defect-Class1,2,3
Solder build up interferes with subsequent attachments to the pin.
Defect-Class2,3
Solder wicking exceeds 2.5mm\[0.0984in].
1.Bottom view
2.Side view
3.Land
4.Top view
5.PCB
Backplanes
Acceptable-Class1,2,3
.Chip on nonmating surface of separable connector pin
.Burnish on mating surface of separable connector pin,providing that plating has not been removed.
.Chip that encroaches the mating surface of separable connector pin which will not be in the mating connector contact
wear path.
A.Sheared/nonmating surface of connector pin
B.Coined/mating surface of connector pin
Defect-Class1,2,3
Chipped pin on mating surface of separable connector
Scratched pin that exposes nonprecious plating or base metal.
Missing plated on required areas.
Burr on pin
Cracked PCB substrate.
Pushed out barrel as indicated by copper protruding from bottom side of PCB.
What components can the S-600-OF place?
The S-600-OF can place components ranging from 0402-??mm2 .
Radial Leaded components
Package range is
What is the minimum/maximum PCB size?
S-600-OF can populate a 2″x2″ (50mmx50mm)/15″x18″ PCB(381mmx460mm)
Thickness range: 0.5mm-5.0mm
Weight is restricted to 3.3 lbs. maximum (completed PCB)
What is the topside/bottomside PCB clearance?
Maximum component height is o.256″(6.5mm)
Bottomside clearance is 30mm under the PCB
1. What will be assembled?
2. How much of it will be assembled?
3. How fast must it be assembled?
4. What operations must be performed?
5. In what order should those operations be completed?
6. Can the product design be adapted to accommodate automation?
7. Where are the “trouble spots” in how the product was previously assembled?
8. How well do the parts and components meet tolerances?
9. What Quality standards does the part have to meet?
10. Is there enough space for the equipment?
11. What kind of environment will the equipment be in?
12. How much money is available to spend and When?
13. Will workers need to be hired to run and maintain the equipment?
14. Will workers need to be reassigned?
15. Will the machine be located in another country?
PC Board Design Checklist
For Through Hole Components
This
document should be used as a supplement to existing machine General
Specifications and IM Design Guidelines. This document is designed as a checklist rather than a reference for use
when examining an existing or new product. For detailed specifications
refer to the appropriate General Specification.
PC board considerations
For Axial or Radial auto insertion:
* Is the overall size of the board within specification? (max/min size varies by machine and board handling type)
* Is the board thickness within specification?
Possible challenges:
Radial
can accept boards from 0.032” to 0.093” thick with no set up change,
axial machines require mechanical adjustment to handle thickness
variations.
* If using automatic board handling, is the board shape acceptable? (i.e. contiguous edges.)
Possible challenges:
Non-contiguous edges, may work but requires testing. Example, instrument cluster.
*
Is the board a good candidate for panelization? (i.e. creating
multiple images of the same board on one panel for ease of assembly and
increased throughput.)
* Is the board warpage within specification?
Possible challenges:
Warpage can cause issues with insertion as well as clinch angle/length, especially on radial machine.
* Does the PC board contain location reference holes to allow proper fixturing?
Possible challenges:
If product was previously hand assembled it may not have locating holes.
* Are the components positioned at 0º and/or 90º with respect to the X axis?
Possible challenges:
Sometimes
components are arranged at odd angles because of space constraints or
because designer wanted to keep component body straight. (example: ECCO
board.)
* Are the component hole diameters within specification for each component type (lead diameter) being inserted?
Possible challenges:
Boards currently hand assembled are most likely to have undersize holes.
* Is there sufficient clearance below the board for the clinched component leads? Consider the following:
* Solder bridging to other component leads
* Solder bridging to via holes or adjacent pads
Note:
Universal does not specify required clearance to prevent solder
bridging, this should be determined by the customer. However, obvious
cases of conflict should be noted.
* Is there sufficient clearance for the insertion and clinch tooling? Take into consideration:
* Previously inserted IM components
* Previously placed SM components
* Workboard holder locating and support fixtures
* Obstructions on the bottom of the board that could interfere with the clinch or board transfer.
Component and tooling considerations
Axial
* Are components packaged properly for automatic insertion? (Tape and reel/ammo pack)
Possible challenges:
Customer may have “sample” components in bulk, are these components readily available in a taped format?
* Is the component input tape width (i.e. 26mm or “standard”) compatible with the component hole span?
Possible challenges:
Universal
does not offer a machine that can accept 26mm input. Virtually all
components are available in 52mm format, however, a subcontractor may
have to deal with “kits” from an OEM that contain 26mm components.
* Is the insertion tooling (i.e. 5mm, 5.5mm or standard) compatible with the component hole span?
Possible challenges:
Does
the product include both very wide and very narrow span components?
Use tooling selection matrix to evaluate best tooling fit.
* Is the component hole span compatible with the component body length?
Possible challenges:
Be especially careful when moving product from hand assembly to automatic assembly.
* Is the component body diameter compatible with the board thickness and insertion tooling requirements?
Possible challenges:
Watch out for very thick boards and/or large diameter components.
* Is the component lead diameter compatible with the insertion tooling? (i.e. standard vs. large lead)
Possible challenges:
May have to sacrifice (to hand assembly) some insertions at either the large end or the small end of the spectrum.
*
Does the component require a stand off between the body and the PC
board? Components requiring a stand off cannot be inserted with an
axial inserter, but may be auto insertable with a radial inserter if
packaged in the proper format.
Possible challenges:
“Stand-off” type resistors are more common where high power handling is required, power supplies, monitors, etc.
Radial
* Are components packaged properly for automatic insertion? (Tape and reel/ammo pack)
Possible challenges:
Customer may have “sample” components in bulk, are these components readily available in a taped format?
*
If components are packaged on tape, use the following “quick check”
list to get a general idea of which components may be automatically
inserted: (See note 1 below)
* Body diameter 13.0mm or less
* “H” dimension (distance from centerline of feed hole to bottom of component) within acceptable limits
* Lead diameter within acceptable limits
Possible challenges:
Radial
taping specifications are quite involved, use “quick check” list as a
sanity check, forward component samples to applications group for
detailed evaluation.
*
Are the lead spans of the components compatible with standard
automatic radial insertion? (i.e. 2.5mm, 5.0mm, 7.5mm or 10.0mm) (See
note 2 below)
Possible challenges:
1) May have to “sacrifice” some components to hand assembly because of tooling footprint issues or span requirements.
2) Some PCB’s contain components are non-standard span’s, i.e. 2.0mm, 4.0mm.
* Are transistor leads in line? (i.e. not in a “triangle” configuration)
* If the component is required to stand off the PC board, are features built into the component lead to accomplish this?
Possible challenges:
Board
designer may “require” a certain type of standoff without checking to
see if the package is readily available, common with LED applications.
Notes:
1) The
simplified guidelines were created to draw attention to the most common
areas where components fall outside the limits for auto insertion.
These simplified guidelines should only be used as a general guide.
Component input must meet all criteria called out in the Radial General
Specification.
2) Tooling selection will depend upon insertion span requirements as well as board density considerations. Muniak98-052B Revised 01-00
1
|
Feature |
Benefit |
|
High performance Positive Axis Control servo-drive system |
Dynamic motion control for smoother, faster, more precise motion, yielding precise component insertion and clinching with less mechanical wear and noise. PAC provides very high repeatability. |
|
Insertion Head |
|
|
The insertion head is direct servo-driven, with a robust and highly reliable rack-and-pinion drive. |
The rack and pinion coupled with the direct drive provide long life and precise positional accuracy, resulting in high cycle rates, greater insertion process control, and lower PPM, with less noise and wear. |
|
Minimized manual set-ups and adjustments |
Elimination of manual set-ups reduces downtime. To ensure consistency, set-ups are now performed through IM UPS Diagnostics software. |
|
Insertion Tooling |
|
|
Newly designed tooling has a significantly longer life –up to five times longer than the previous model. |
Tooling has to be replaced less often, reducing down time, tooling inventory and cost. |
|
Tooling uses carbide inserts and titanium nitride coating. |
This extends the tooling life. |
|
The new design better handles bent input component leads. |
The robust design reduces machine interruptions & down time caused by bent input component leads. |
|
Four tooling options are available: 5mm: insertion spans from 5mm (0.197”) to 21.59mm ( 0.85”) 5.5mm: insertion spans from 5.5mm(0.217”) to 24.13mm (0.95”) Standard: Insertion spans from 7.62mm (0.3”) to 24.13mm (0.95”) Large Lead: insertion spans from 7.62mm (0.3”) to 23.88mm (0.94”) |
These options satisfy most applications. If you are unsure which tooling to choose, contact the Product Team |
|
Centering System |
|
|
New cam-actuated component centering system is driven by the insertion head motor |
The new design significantly increases reliability. |
|
The centering door has been eliminated. |
Better visibility and accessibility to the insertion area. |
|
Adjustments have been reduced by 50%. |
Only five simple adjustments are required on the centering system, reducing maintenance time. |
|
The new centering system is a simple design, with 50% part reduction over the previous model. |
The design provides increased reliability and extended life, with significantly less maintenance. |
|
The centering fingers have replaceable carbide inserts |
The inserts keep costs down and reduce maintenance cost and time. |
|
Servo-Driven Cut and Clinch |
|
|
The clinch is operated with a servo-driven rocker/slide mechanism. |
This mechanism provides quiet and repeatable up/down operation, increasing reliability and reducing maintenance. |
|
The servo-driven anvil mechanism operates in a two-step motion. The lower position is used for table rotation and board transfer, while the mid-position to full up-position is used for cutting and clinching component leads. |
The two step motion reduces motion cycle time and increases operating life. |
|
Right and left anvils are coupled. |
The coupled anvils assure synchronous operation and simplify set-ups. |
|
Anvil height set-up is performed via IM diagnostics software. |
Guesswork is eliminated. The anvil height is consistently set to program dimensions through the software, for greater accuracy and precision. |
|
All mechanical adjustments are in the front and on the top of the clinch base. |
The adjustments are in easy-to-reach locations, making them quicker and easier to perform. |
|
The clinch assembly is pinned to the frame. |
Head alignment after clinch removal and replacement is eliminated. |
|
The clinch cutters use the proven Universal pneumatic actuators. |
The actuators assure a full range of operation on leads from 0.38mm (0.015”) to 0.81mm (0.032”). |
|
Positioning System |
|
|
The positioning system operates by new X-Y motors with tachometer feedback and more responsive servo amplifiers. |
7.62mm (0.30”) table moves are possible with no effect on machine cycle rate. |
|
The table motion is smoother and more controlled. |
Improved table motion increases the life of mechanical parts. |
|
Insertion Span Axis |
|
|
The insertion span axis uses a direct drive system with a brushless DC servo motor. |
This drive eliminates belts, external motors, and limit switches, for greater reliability and less maintenance, while providing more precise positioning. |
|
Chain-to-Chain Transfer |
|
|
The new scrap remover is mechanical. |
The design is a passive mechanical device that is quiet, clean and reliable. |
|
The sequencer chain drive is operated by a new brushless servo motor. |
The drive gives more precise dynamic position control for improved component transfer, lowering PPM. |
|
Board Error Correction (BEC) and “Teach” |
|
|
BEC is a four quadrant electro-optical sensor, used to measure expected programmed PCB hole locations. It provides feedback to the control processor to compensate for PCB hole misalignment, which drives the X-Y table to the desired hole location. |
BEC adjusts a given pattern to a given board, significantly lowering PPM. BEC compensate for circuit board construction variations between tooling holes and related patterns, improving insertion reliability. |
|
“Teach”uses BEC to custom fit a pattern to a board. |
“Teach”greatly improves pattern accuracy and lowers PPM. |
|
Add – On Sequencer Modules |
|
|
The sequencer is available with up to 220 stations (in 20-station add-on modules). |
The add-on modules provide flexibility in meeting a variety of applications. |
|
Improved “Low Part’warning is displayed on the machine monitor, which indicates the module and level of the “low part”condition. |
“Low Part”warning is more visible to the operator, defining the location better. The warning is recorded, for better process control. |
|
The dispense head guides and bearings are newly designed. |
The new design improves reliability and ease of use. |
|
The pneumatic valves are DC. |
DC valve provide improved response for more consistent dispense head actuation. |
|
Refire |
|
|
Optical refire senses missing parts in the component input tape. |
Refire reduces “Part Missing”errors by actuating the dispense head if a part is not sensed in the component input tape. |
|
Easy-to-see LEDs show dispense head refire status. |
The LED’s simplify input component loading by visibly displaying refire status and input component sensing in the dispense head. |
|
Refire information is fed back to the machine controller |
The feedback provides better information for machine performance analysis. |
|
Jumper Wire Dispense System |
|
|
Up to two jumper wire dispensers may be used in the machine. Jumper wire dispensers may be placed on stations 3 and 23. |
Even the most “jumper wire intense”applications can be satisfied with no effect to machine cycle speed. |
|
Jumper wire dispenser design improvements: Improved wire feeder alignment New drive bearing |
The new design gives better cut length accuracy and increased wire dispense reliability, longer bearing life. |
|
System Software |
|
|
The VCD/Sequencer 8 utilizes IM-Universal Platform Software (IM-UPS) |
This is the same Windows-based software used in Universal’s other through hole Series 8 machines and surface mount equipment, reducing the learning curve for operation, maintenance, and programming. |
|
Graphical user interface with “pop-up”error screens |
Easy to understand and use, especially for non-English speakers. |
|
Advanced Product Editor (APE) offers a component library, graphical display of PC board, and insertion path. |
APE makes programming quick, accurate, and easy. |
|
Optimization feature |
Optimization improves programs by ordering steps in the fastest insertion path. |
|
Management data is generated & stored in a database |
Machine performance can be tracked and graphed to provide a quick aid for decision making and reporting. |
|
Machine event messages are displayed and logged. |
Machine activity can be traced, greatly aiding analysis. |
|
Diagnostics are provided on-line |
The diagnostics through software provide point-and-click simplicity for set-up and sub-system troubleshooting. |
|
On-line manuals and user help is provided |
Eliminates the need to keep manuals near the machine |
|
Product trainer |
Available in English, Spanish, and Chinese, Product Trainer provides operating and maintenance instructions through a CD. This tool increases workforce competency and productivity |
|
Repair |
|
|
The operator clears any misinserted component, and places a new component in the repair location. If the ERV option is present, the machine verifies the correct part, inserts it, and clinches it automatically. |
The “repair”mode enables outgoing board quality to reach 0 PPM. |
|
Expanded Range Verifier (ERV) –Option |
|
|
ERV provides on-line verification of component values and polarity. |
ERV reduces the possibility of inserting defective, out-of-sequence, or incorrectly oriented components in the pattern location. |
|
Other Features |
|
|
Uninterruptable Power Supply |
In the event of a blackout or brown out, the UPS provides up to 10 minutes of power. This allows the operator to save patterns and end the current cycle. |
|
Audible alarm |
The audible alarm is programmable to alert operators of machine conditions. |
HIGH SPEED DISPENSING OF SURFACE MOUNT ADHESIVE BETWEEN SOLDER PASTED PADS
Introduction
Surface mount
adhesive has been a part of electronics manufacturing applications from
the beginning of SMT. It has been used, in conjunction with wave
soldering processes, to successfully solder millions of components to
the bottom sides of printed circuit boards. In an effort to make the
manufacturing processes more robust and to improve the quality of the
assemblies, a solder paste printing step and a reflow soldering step
have been added to many traditional bottom side assembly lines. These
operations are added in order to decrease defects such as missing
components and insufficient solder joints. Both SMT (double sided
reflow) and Through hole (mixed SMT/THT) processes can benefit from this
process utilizing adhesive and solder paste. Some of the process
considerations are nozzle design, pad design, PCB layout, stencil
design, and adhesive properties. This article will deal with the
characteristics that must be considered in setting up this process, how
it can be implemented successfully, and typical line configurations
associated with this process. The major foundation of traditional
bottom side assembly processes is the adhesive.
Adhesive Selection
When selecting an
adhesive for applications involving the dispensing of surface mount
adhesives between solder pasted pads, it is important to choose an
adhesive that is formulated to give very specific rheological, or flow
properties. The adhesive selected should be formulated to allow for a
higher profile dot that exhibits very little slump. This will allow the
glue to contact the component, above the height of the solder paste
deposition, when the component is placed. Dots dispensed for this type
of application should have a tall, cylindrical shape as opposed to the
typical triangular Hershey kiss dot profile. The typical profile may
not allow the glue to properly adhere to the component prior to curing
and then hold the component through wave soldering. This will cause a
large number of missing component errors to be seen following the wave
soldering operation. Excessive missing components following manual
assembly may also be seen because the glue joint is not large enough to
provide the strength needed to hold the components in place.
The surface mount
adhesive chosen for these applications must also have a high green
strength in order to hold the component prior to the curing process. It
is this green strength that also helps the adhesive to maintain the
tall cylindrical dot shape needed when dispensing between solder pasted
pads. Without it the adhesive deposit will slump, losing contact area
with the component, and causing a decrease in the strength of the
adhesive joints.
In adhesive
dispensing processes utilizing heat, it is difficult to achieve the
necessary dot height. By applying heat to the adhesive, the material’s
viscosity is lowered, allowing it to flow more easily. This type of
flow characteristic will cause the adhesive dot to slump after
dispensing. Problems related to the adhesive not contacting the
component (missing components after wave soldering, etc.) will increase
in frequency, as well as the number of opportunities for defects such as
pad contamination to occur.
Board Design
Typically,
surface mount component pads are designed for either adhesive deposition
or the screening of solderpaste. The pad spacing is generally smaller
for solderpaste application as opposed to that of adhesive deposition.
For example, the component pad spacing between the pads of a 0603 chip
cap/resistor is typically 0.020”, if the board was designed to be screen
printed with solderpaste. The pad spacing for the same board can be
0.040” if adhesive deposition was to be utilized. A 0.030” diameter dot
of adhesive would easily be recommended for use if the component pads
on the board were indeed designed for adhesive deposition. However, if
the pad design for the same board was originally designed for
utilization of solderpaste, as a method of adhering the component to the
board, obviously, an 0.030” diameter dot of adhesive would be too
large, as the spacing between the pads is now 0.020”. A 0.015” to 0.018”
diameter dot is required for this particular application.
In designing pad
spacing and component spacing, the height of the pad and the solder
paste deposition must also be taken into consideration. Typically, the
height of an adhesive dot is one half the diameter of the dot.
Depending upon the material used for the pads, it would be possible
design a board which would be impossible to print and dispense adhesive
on. If the typical dot size for a 0603 component were 0.015” to 0.018”,
the height would be approximately 0.0075” to 0.009”. If the thickness
of the stencil utilized to print the solder paste was 0.006” to 0.007”
this might not allow the glue dot to contact the component body on some
types of board finishes. For example, a typical HASL finish is
approximately 0.003” thick. If the thickness of the stencil utilized
were 0.007”, the adhesive dot would have to be at least 0.011” to 0.012”
tall to properly contact the component. This would require
approximately a 0.022” diameter dot. This is why the rheology of the
adhesive is so important. If the adhesive slumps at all after
dispensing, it may not properly contact the component. The nozzle
design also plays a part in the development of the correct dot for each
application.
Nozzle Design
When selecting a nozzle for use in dispensing adhesives the main characteristics that must be considered are nozzle
design, standoff size and placement, and nozzle ID. A relationship
exists between these characteristics and the adhesive dot diameter.
When the adhesive volume is dispensed, the surface tension of the
adhesive on the board, should be twice that of the surface area of the
adhesive at the nozzle tip. If this condition exists, as the nozzle
retracts, the adhesive will snap off clean from the nozzle and leave a
well-defined dot of constant volume on the board. The nozzle must be
chosen based upon the size dot that is required by the application.
Nozzle selection
refers in this case to specific nozzle specifications for a known dot
size requirement. The dot size requirements can be derived from the
board design being utilized or specifically the pad spacing of
components. Reference pad spacing previously discussed in this paper. It
is not uncommon for Manufacturing Engineer personnel or Quality
Engineering personnel of a printed circuit board manufacturing facility,
to inquire what a recommended adhesive dot diameter should be for a
particular component type. Much has been written in regards to
recommended surface mount component pad designs and layouts for bottom
side applications. Topside pad designs are also used on bottom side PCB
fabrication. However these guidelines are rarely utilized. The pad
spacing for a particular component for each individual customer product
is unique.
Because the pad
spacing for most typical surface mount components is not standardized
from one customer product to another, it becomes a challenging task when
recommending what tooling should be utilized to satisfy a particular
customers’ adhesive deposition requirement for a particular component.
Note that the
volume of adhesive needed to maintain the component in place during the
high speed placement or wave solder process may be larger than possible
for some specific pad designs.
The nozzle standoff
can be defined as the distance from the tip of the dispensing surface
to the end of the mechanical standoff. The nozzle standoff is used to
maintain the distance between the PCB and the dispensing tip. Most
dispensers in use today are designed to utilize some sort of mechanical
standoff with the nozzles. The standoff usually dictates, to some
degree, the height of the dispensed dot
Typical designs for
nozzle standoffs are the castle design, the post design, or a dual post
design. For applications utilizing surface mount adhesive between pads
that have had solder paste applied to them, a single post design nozzle
is the most appropriate. In this type of application the standoff
should be set at 45 ° , 135 ° , 215 ° , or 315 ° around the pad circuitry.
When selecting the
correct nozzle ID a rule of thumb is that the nozzle ID should be one
half of the required dot diameter. This will allow for the correct dot
diameter to be dispensed so that the glue snaps away from the nozzle
without contamination. By beginning with this guideline, the
approximate nozzle diameter can be determined, and then adjusted based
upon the material utilized.
Stencil Printing Considerations
When printing
solder paste prior to dispensing surface mount adhesive, there are some
stencil design considerations that must be taken into account. The
thickness of the stencil is important because it will determine the
height of the solder paste depositions. This also determines the
minimum height of the dot that must be dispensed in order to properly
contact and hold the component. In applications where wave soldering
will follow manual assembly, a smaller stencil thickness may be used
because the ultimate solder joint quality will be determined by the wave
soldering operation. It may also be beneficial, on pads with very
tight pads spacing, to undercut the stencil so that as much space as
possible is available for adhesive deposition.
Adhesive Curing
When printing
solder paste and dispensing epoxy between solder pasted pads a
specialized cure cycle is required. Curing epoxy at 150º C is a
bondline temperature that should be verified with thermocouples at
various locations. Curing epoxy at temperatures above 160º C can cause
the adhesive to become brittle, leading to possible component loss
during the solder wave process. The solution for this is that the epoxy
must be cured at 150º C for about 90 seconds prior to ramping to the
reflow temp. This type of reflow takes into account the adhesive cure
as well as the solder paste reflow. Care should be taken to check the
quality of the solder joints achieved with this profile. The graph
below is a sample of what the cure cycle should look like. The final
profile should take into account the recommended profiles from both the
adhesive and from the solder paste manufacturers.
Placement Machine Considerations
When selecting a
placement machine for use in a process utilizing the dispensing of
surface mount adhesives between solder pasted pads, it is important to
consider the accuracy and the repeatability of the placement machine
down line. In typical top side applications utilizing solder paste
printing, when the solder paste is reflowed, the forces associated with
the solder, automatically center the component, within reason, on its
pads. When glue is added to the process this does not occur because the
glue resists these forces since it is cured prior to the reflowing of
the solder paste. It is important to consider all of the machines in
the line when developing this type of process.
Typical Manufacturing Line Configurations
Traditional Bottom Side Line
GDM Adhesive Dispenser
Vitronics Reflow Oven
HSP Chipshooter
Typically, a
traditional bottom side manufacturing line includes an adhesive
dispenser, a chipshooter to place the bottom side components, and an
oven to cure the adhesive. This line will be followed by a wave solder
machine, which will in turn be followed by an inspection and/or rework
station.
The first thing
that must be considered when setting up any manufacturing line is the
type of components and assemblies that are going to be used or built on
it. A traditional bottom side line can be used simply to apply glue to a
printed circuit board, place components on the board, and then cure the
glue in order to hold the parts onto the board prior and during wave
soldering and manual assembly. In this type of application the green
strength of the material determines whether components stay in place
during placement operation on the chipshooter. The post cure strength
of the adhesive determines whether or not the components will stay on
the board during manual assembly and handling. This makes the choice of
glue very important. After wave solder, using this type of line, parts
may be missing due to missing or unacceptable adhesive dots or some may
have be knocked off the board during manual assembly or handling. Care
should be taken to control the forces that these assemblies are
subjected to. This line is very basic in its functionality but can
reliably build products when implemented correctly.
Bottom Side Line With Solder Paste Application
HSP Chipshooter
DEK Stencil Printer
Vitronics Reflow Oven
GDM Adhesive Dispenser
A bottom side line,
that includes solder paste application, incorporates a system for
applying the solder paste (stencil printer or high speed dispenser), an
adhesive dispenser, a chipshooter for the bottom side components, and an
oven to cure the adhesive and reflow the solder paste. A wave solder
machine and an inspection and/or rework station will then follow this
line.
This type of
manufacturing line is more flexible than the previously discussed line.
For bottom side applications, this configuration provides greater torque
strength due to the adhesive being combined with solder paste. This
will assist in reducing the number of missing part defects present in
the assembly. This type of line also helps to reduce problems related
to the wave soldering operation (insufficient solder). In this type of
application, the dot height is important to consider because the dot
must be tall enough to contact the component even above the solder paste
deposit. Consideration also must be given to the design of the stencil
used to print the solder paste and the design of the nozzle used for
high speed dispensing operations. Both of these points can turn into
problems later if not considered properly.
Mixed Technology Top/Bottom Assembly with Solder Paste Application
Vitronics Reflow Oven
HSP Chipshooter
GDM Adhesive Dispenser
DEK Stencil Printer
GSM Flexible Placement
A mixed technology
line for assembling top and bottom side products includes a system for
applying the solder paste (stencil printer or high speed dispenser), an
adhesive dispenser, a chipshooter to place the bottom side components, a
flexible placement machine to place top and bottom side components, and
an oven to cure the adhesive and reflow the solder paste. A wave
solder machine and an inspection station will then follow this line.
The inspection station however, should see limited use because of the
robustness of this process.
This manufacturing
line is more flexible than either of the previously discussed lines.
Like the bottom side manufacturing line with solder paste, on bottom
side applications, this configuration provides greater torque strength
due to the adhesive being combined with solder paste. This assists in
reducing the number of missing parts present in the assembly. This
also helps to reduce problems related to the wave soldering operation
(insufficient solder). In this type of application, the dot height is
important to consider because the dot must be tall enough to contact the
component over and above the solder paste deposit. Consideration also
must be given to the design of the stencil used to print the solder
paste and the design of the nozzle used for high speed dispensing
operations. This line also can be used for topside applications
including the deposition of solder paste, chip placement and flexible
placement (QFPs and BGAs for example). This type of flexible
manufacturing line has become the choice for contract electronics
manufacturers because it offers a simple, total assembly solution.
Conclusion
The dispensing of
surface mount adhesives has been a part of electronics manufacturing
since the development of surface mount components. In an effort to make
the processes involved more robust, solder paste has been added to many
manufacturing line configurations. This configuration helps to
eliminate defects such as missing components and insufficient solder
joints following wave soldering.
In order to
implement this process there are a lot of considerations that must be
taken into account. The type of adhesive used must have rheological
properties that allow for a tall, cylindrical dot versus the typical
Hershey kiss shaped dot. This type of dot is required to properly
adhere to the component when it is placed on top of the solder paste
deposits. In order to obtain the correct dot height, the board design
must be considered carefully. By designing in the correct pad spacing,
implementation of this process is much simpler. The volume of solder
paste required must then be determined as well as the design of the
stencil. The required adhesive dot size must be considered when
designing the stencil. After the board is designed and the volume of
solder paste required has been determined, a nozzle must be designed to
provide the correct dot diameter with standoffs that will not become
contaminated with solder paste. After the adhesive is deposited and the
chips have been placed, the glue must be cured and the solder paste
must be reflowed. The profile used for this process must be developed
from the adhesive and the solder paste manufacturers’ recommended
profiles. Finally, the type of assemblies that are going to be built
must be considered when developing a manufacturing line that will meet
your needs now and in the future.
By carefully
considering all aspects of your manufacturing process, the dispensing of
surface mount adhesives between solder pasted pads can help eliminate
defects associated with typical electronics manufacturing processes.
This process helps to eliminate problems such as insufficient solder
joints. In applications where only glue was previously utilized, this
type of process can help eliminate defects such as missing components,
that can occur as a result of handling and manual assembly. By taking
time to consider the characteristics of your manufacturing process, the
correct line configuration and process parameters can be developed to
build the highest quality assemblies possible.
Quality System Assessment Summary Report
|
Supplier: |
Commodity Team: |
Primary Audit Contact: |
|
Address: |
|
|
|
|
Supplier Commodity/Product Specialty: |
Audit Team: |
|
Phone: |
||
|
Fax: |
|
Elements |
Max. |
Audit Date:
|
Re-audit Date: / / |
% Improvement |
Physical/ Logistical Capabilities (for information only) |
Score (0-3) |
|
|
Score |
Score |
Score |
A. Geographic location |
3 |
|
1 Management Responsibility |
|
|
B. Plant condition / size |
3 |
|||
|
2 Quality System |
|
|
C. Employment / labor recruiting |
2 |
|||
|
3 Contract Review |
|
|
D. Finance resources |
3 |
|||
|
4 Design Control |
|
|
E. Pricing history |
2 |
|||
|
5 Document and Data Control |
|
|
F. Equip. Condition /age / application
|
2 |
|||
|
6 Purchasing and verification
|
|
|
G. Backlog / capacity status |
2 |
|
7 Customer Supplied Products |
|
|
Yes/ No for following |
|
8 Product Identification and Traceability |
4 |
|
H. ISO / QS 9000 certified |
Yes |
|||
|
9 Process Control |
|
|
I. Design Capability |
Yes |
|||
|
10 Inspection and Testing |
|
|
J. Quick turn/prototype capability |
Yes |
|||
|
11 Control of Inspection and Test Equip.
|
12 |
|
K. JIT capability / Kanban |
Yes |
|
12 Inspection and Test Status |
2 |
|
||||
|
13 Control of Nonconforming Product |
|
|
||||
|
14 Corrective and Preventive Action |
6 |
|
Calculations: |
|||
|
15 Handling, Storage, Pack. and Delivery |
9 |
|
1. Quality System Score (%): |
|||
|
16 Control of Quality Records |
5 |
|
Total Audit Score x 100 |
|||
|
17 Internal Auditing |
10 |
|
(Total Max. Score – N/A Score) |
|||
|
18 Training |
6 |
|
2. % Improvement: |
|||
|
19 Servicing |
4 |
|
(New Score – Previous Score) x 100 |
|||
|
20 Statistical Techniques |
30 |
|
Previous Score |
|||
|
21 Continuous Improvements |
|
|
|
Total Score |
|
|
Auditor’s Signature:
|
|||
|
% Score |
|
Date: |
Quality Control
Every Auto Insertionl machine
is subjected to a Quality Acceptance Test (QAT) before being shipped to
its customer. There are 4 phases to a QAT:
Phase I – Pre-Dry Cycle
The
appropriate pattern program is loaded and the machine performs a short
part run with all motions and mechanisms functioning to check setups and
speed. All data is recorded on the machine’s event log.
Phase II – Dry Cycle
Can
only occur after successful completion of the Pre-Dry Cycle. The
machine is run with all motions and mechanisms functioning but without
boards or inserting components for a pre-specified period of time. All
data is recorded on the machine’s event log.
Phase III – Integrity Run (Final Run)
Can
only occur after successful completion of the Dry Cycle. This is a
simulated production run to check insertion performance and speed.
Results are recorded on the machine’s event log.
|
|
Axial Inserter S4000 |
|
|
Radial Inserter S3000 |
|
|
Phase I |
|||||
|
Parts Run |
|
2000 |
|
2000 |
|
|
Insertion PPM * |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Intrinsic Availability ** |
|
100% |
|
100% |
|
|
Phase II |
|||||
|
Length of Run |
|
12 hrs. |
|
12 hrs. |
|
|
Intrinsic Availability |
|
95% |
|
95% |
|
|
Phase III |
|||||
|
Minimum Parts Run |
|
20000 |
|
20000 |
|
|
Allowable Insert Errors |
|
10 |
|
20 |
|
|
Intrinsic Availability |
|
95% |
|
95% |
|
|
Acceptable PPM Levels |
|
500 – 1000 |
|
1000 |
|
|
Confidence Level |
|
95% |
|
95% |
* (# of good insertions / total # of insertions)
** (# of hours the machine is ready to run / total # of hours machine planned to run)
Phase IV – Customer Acceptance (Optional)
Can
only occur after successful completion of the Integrity Run. The
customer visits the factory to watch verify the machine’s ability to
meet performance requirements. The customer’s production run is
simulated and all options are verified and explained.
For any further questions regarding the customer acceptance procedure, please contact:
Albert Wen
Albert@smthelp.net
Phase V – Preproduction Acceptance (At customer site)
Service engineer installs the machine and assures it is setup
and running with the same degree of operational efficiency as at the
factory.
WARRANTY POLICY ON ALL NEW Machines
Southern Machinery warrants its products to be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one year from completion of installation, provided the products are installed as specified by Southern Machinery, maintained by qualified service personnel and the products are operated in accordance with published operating procedures. For purposes of the foregoing warranties the “completion of installation” shall be that date, within 90 days of shipment of Southern Machinery’s products from its factory, on which the products are installed and operating to the published specifications. If the customer believes a product to be defective in material or workmanship, or failing to meet the specifications, the customer shall notify Southern Machinery of such alleged defect or failure. Southern Machinery shall have a reasonable opportunity to investigate any alleged defect or failure, and upon confirmation of its existence Southern Machinery shall promptly remedy the same by repair or replacement, at its discretion and without charge. The seller warrants parts repaired or replaced for the duration of the original warranty period.
The warranty does not apply to:
1. Consumable parts as they are defined in this document.
or
2. Defects or failures as a result of non-compliance with U Southern Machinery’s installation specifications.
or
3. The customer’s failure to perform the recommended normal maintenance, set up and the adjustment of the equipment.
or
4. The customer’s alteration / modification to the equipment without Southern Machinery’s prior written approval.
or
5. Damages to the equipment resulting from non-compliance with published operating procedures.
or
6. The use of replacement parts not supplied by Southern Machinery or Southern Machinery’s approved suppliers.
Definition of Consumable Parts (Non Warranty):
A) Machine parts that come in direct contact with component processing.
Examples are, but are not limited to, insertion head tooling, chain clips, lead cutter tooling, etc.
B) Maintenance/bulk items.
Examples are, but are not limited to, lubricants, adhesives, light bulbs, fuses, seals, o-rings, etc.
All other machine parts are warranted for 12 months from the machine in-service date, completion of installation.
Disclaimer Statement:
The life expectancy of consumable tooling is dependent on proper preventive maintenance, proper machine set-up, and the type of component used by the customer. A customer may experience greater life expectancy or less life expectancy depending on the above.
Axial Products Competitive Analysis
|
Competitor |
Location |
Key Weaknesses |
Key Strengths |
Comments |
|
TDK (Rank 2) |
Japan/U.S. |
No Axial experience No previous Axial machines in product mix, offering only a SH VCD (no Sequencer, DH, etc.) Axial product offering is VERY similar to Dynapert V12000. Possible patent infringements on Dynapert design. Support infrastructure is inferior to UIC’s. |
Low price machines Field proven reliability of Radial Inserter Large multi-national installed base for Radial Inserter Japanese firm, thus strong JMA loyalty Asian company, thus understands Asian business needs Operates in Microsoft Windows interface, which provides immediate productivity feedback Financially sound and stable |
Offer a SH VCD – Avisert AC-7 |
TDK Competitive Summary
|
|
AC-7 Avisert Features: · Board offset correction · Insertion hole correction · Ammo or reel input packaging · Push button control panel · Microsoft Windows interface · Intelligent operator message feedback · Servo driven cam operated insertion head · Servo motor driven rotary table · Available Options: – Pass through capability – Throughput optimizer – Flexible work board holder – Touch screen – Pattern repeat – Multi tier security software – Optical safety device – Integrated machine enclosure |
Key Sell Against Points:
Universal offers a complete Axial product line; Single Head, Dual Head, VCD Sequencer and Sequencers while TDK offers a single Axial machine.
Universal completes the IM product offering with Radials and Special Products which include Eyelet and Pin Inserting Machines, and 3-Span Radials.
We offer optional Universal board handling on most models.
Universal offers a superior training, service and support infrastructure.
We offer industry leading cost per insertion and the highest throughput per square foot of floor space.
UIC Strengths and Proof Points:
|
UIC Strengths |
Benefit |
For the Customer: |
|
Machine designs allow flexibility in the production environment. |
Universal offers a complete IM product line of Axial inserters, Sequencers and combination machines, as well as Radial product offerings. Universal board handling is optional for machine integration. |
Discuss customer need for factory integration. Possible future need for increased automation. |
|
High value for the price, and fastest inserters in the industry. |
Dual Head machines provide the highest throughput in the industry, 32,000 cph, a cost effective approach for high volume applications. |
Ask the customer to compare cost per insertion. |
|
Superior service, support and training. |
Excellent investment protection. UIC is a respected and secure provider of insertion equipment. Pre and post sale assistance with specific applications and systems integration. |
Ask the customer to compare UIC’s support infrastructure (tech. specialists, spare parts, FE response time) to Panasonic. Also discuss unique value benefits – Uptime 100 and Tech Advisor. |
TDK Strengths and Counter Points:
|
Competitor Strength |
The Facts |
For the Customer: |
|
Perceived high throughput (16,000 CPH). |
The throughput Nepcon Tokyo 觀appeared closer to 10,000 CPH. Noisy. |
Demonstrate UIC’s commitment to reducing customer costs by: 1. Comparing cost per insertion. |
|
Single insertion head provides better stability and less maintenance and setup. |
Dual head machine is the highest throughput inserter in the industry with exceptional reliability and insertion performance. Single head machine offers competitive cost per insertion with all the other values of UIC. |
Demonstrate UIC commitment to customer support with: 1. Service and support, including PM schedules and maintenance manuals. 2. Uptime 100 program. 3. Tech Advisor. 4. Superior training program. |
|
Priced competitively in the 80K – 106K range. |
Targeting existing Dynapert accounts where support requirements are minimal. |
Demonstrate UIC’s commitment to reducing customer costs by: 1. Comparing cost per insertion. |
|
Financial backing from a major IM provider. |
Very similar to Dynapert V12000 machine Possible patent infringements on Dynapert design. Not a complete product line, no complementary Sequencer available to date or board handling. May not have devoted TDK backing for service and support. |
Determine if customer is will to obtain investment protection: 1. From a supplier that may not remain in business due to legal problems. 2. Has revived very old designs. 3. Discuss Broome Engineering products for low cost entry and their ability to allow trade-up. |
Appendix – Reference Accounts and Testimonials:
|
Account Name |
Salesman to contact |
Comments |
|
AT&T Monterey, Mexico |
Michael Lewis |
TDK offered AT&T accepted an all expenses paid trip to Boston to evaluate the AC-7 but still prefers the UIC Dual Head machines. |